Artificial intelligence in clinical research

Authors

  • Veerabhadra Sanekal Nayak Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Mohammed Saleem Khan Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Bharat Kumar Shukla Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
  • Pranjal R. Chaturvedi Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20163955

Keywords:

Artificial intelligence, Clinical trials, Information technology, Risk based monitoring, Drug development, Risk mitigation

Abstract

Envision dedicating fifteen years to a critical interest and emptying staggering amount of funds into it, at the same time confronting a disappointment rate of 95 percent. That is the crippling reality for pharmaceutical organizations, which toss billions of dollars consistently toward medications that possible won't work – and after that do a reversal to the planning phase and do it once more. Today's medications go to the business sector after an extensive, very costly process of drug development. It takes anywhere in the range of 10 to 15 years, here and there significantly more, to convey a medication from introductory revelation to the hands of patients – and that voyage can cost billions up to 12 billion, to be correct. That is just a lot to spend, and excessively yearn for patients to hold up. Patients can hardly wait 15 years for a lifesaving drug, we require another productive focused on medication revelation and improvement process. Artificial Intelligence, can significantly reduce the time included, and also cut the expenses by more than half. This is made conceivable through a totally distinctive way to deal with medication revelation. With the present technique, for each 100 medications that achieve first stage clinical trials, only one goes ahead to wind up a genuine treatment. That is stand out percent, it's an unsustainable model, particularly when there are ailments, for example, pancreatic malignancy which has a normal five-year survival rate of 6%.

Author Biographies

Veerabhadra Sanekal Nayak, Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Subject Matter Expert
Risk Based Monitoring

Mohammed Saleem Khan, Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Subject Matter Expert
Risk Based Monitoring

Bharat Kumar Shukla, Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Subject Matter Expert
Risk Based Monitoring

Pranjal R. Chaturvedi, Department of Risk Based Monitoring, Tata Consultancy Services Ltd, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Subject Matter Expert
Risk Based Monitoring

References

Pixabay Image source. 2015. Available at https://pixabay.com/en/header-banner-head-display-dummy-915122/. Accessed 02 March 2016.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine: an Introduction. 2004. Available at http://www.openclinical.org/aiin

medicine.html. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Clinical Trials AI. 2015. Available at http://www.m

edrespond.com/technology/pharmaceutical/clinical-trials. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Shortliffe EH. The adolescence of AI in medicine: will the field come of age in the '90s?. Artif Intell Med. 1993;5(2):93106.

Coiera E, Baud R, Console L, Cruz J, Durinck J, Frutiger P, et al. The Role of Knowledge Based Systems in Clinical Practice. In: Barahona and Christenen eds, Knowledge and Decisions in Health Telematics The Next Decade. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 1994: 199-203.

Clancey WJ, Shortcliffe EH. Readings in Medical Artificial Intelligence: the First Decade Reading, MA: Addison Wesley; 1984.

Baxt WG. A neural network trained to identify the presence of myocardial infarction bases some decisions on clinical associations that differ from accepted clinical teaching. Med Decision Making. 1994;14:217-22.

Cross SS, Harrison RF, Kennedy RL. Introduction to neural networks. Lancet. 1995;346:1075-9.

Baxt WG. Application of artificial neural networks to clinical medicine. Lancet. 1995;346:1135-8.

Burke HB, Goodman PH, Rosen DB, Henson DE, Weinstein JN, Harrell FE Jr, et al. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction. Cancer. 1997;79:857-62.

Lee SD. Biotech startup hope to cure cancer with AI. 2015. Available at http://hitconsultant.net/2015/

/10/this-biotech-startup-hopes-to-cure-cancer - with-artificial-intelligence. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Borukhovich E. How will artificial intelligence change in healthcare. 2015. Available at http://www.weforum.org/agenda/2015/10/how-will-artificial-intelligence-change-healthcare. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Bruce A, Hinshaw D. Artificial Intelligence perspectives on the acute care. 2015. Available at http://www.cepamerica.com/news-resources/perspec

tives-on-the-acute-carecontinuum/2015-december/

most-popular-2-artificial-intelligence. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Kannan PV. Artificial Intelligence. 2016. Available at http://www.asianhhm.com/technologyequipment/

artificial-intelligence. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Tao AL. How artificial intelligence AI is be used by Asean business. 2015. Available at http://www.com

puterweekly.com/ news/4500251390/How-Arificial-intelligence-AI-is-being-tested-by-Asean business. Accessed on 02 March 2016.

Downloads

Published

2016-10-22

Issue

Section

Review Articles