DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20183179

A quasi-experimental study evaluating a health promotion program targeting healthy nutrition, physical activity and social network enhancement for low-income multi-problem households: study protocol

Latifa Abidi, Gera E. Nagelhout, Renate Spruijt, Hermijn Schutte, Hein de Vries

Abstract


Background: Previous studies have shown that people living in multi-problem households are less physically active, eat less healthy, have unstable social networks, and worse self-perceived general health than other people. The aim of this paper is to describe the development and evaluation of a health promotion program called “Back2Balance” for low-income multi-problem households aimed at improving healthy nutrition, physical activity, social networks, and self-perceived health.

Methods: The Back2Balance program was developed using input from two formative studies and a co-creation process together with the target group and social workers. We used the theoretical domains framework to identify the functional components of our program. The Back2Balance program consists of: 1) a walking group, 2) cooking workshops, 3) motivational talks, 4) discounts on existing health promotion programs, and 5) family trips and children’s activities. In a quasi-experimental study respondents in the intervention group receive the usual social services support for multi-problem households and have the possibility to enroll in the program. Respondents in the control group only receive usual social services support. The program will be evaluated among 272 respondents from low-income multi-problem households living in Apeldoorn, the Netherlands.

Conclusions: This protocol describes the development and evaluation of the Back2Balance program. We hypothesize that the program will lead to increased physical activity, healthy nutrition, social networks enhancement, and self-perceived health. The results of this study can be used as input for other national or international initiatives aiming to increase health of low-income multi-problem households.

Trial registration: NTR6512

 


Keywords


Multi-problem households, Physical activity, Healthy nutrition, Social network

Full Text:

PDF

References


Kavanagh A, Bentley RJ, Turrell G, Shaw J, Dunstan D, Subramanian SV. Socioeconomic position, gender, health behaviours and biomarkers of cardiovascular disease and diabetes. Social science and medicine. 2010;71(6):1150-60.

Phelan JC, Link BG, Tehranifar P. Social conditions as fundamental causes of health inequalities: theory, evidence, and policy implications. J Health and Social Behavior. 2010;51(1):28-40.

Wilkinson RG, Pickett KE. Income inequality and population health: a review and explanation of the evidence. Social Sci Med. 2006;62(7):1768-84.

Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, Devries K, Kiss L, Ellsberg M, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women's health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):109.

Holwerda A, Reijneveld S, Jansen D. De effectiviteit van hulpverlening aan multiprobleemgezinnen: Een overzicht. [The effectiveness of care for multiproblem families: An overview]. University Medical Centre Groningen: Groningen, Netherlands, 2014.

World Health Organization. Social determinants of mental health. World Health Organization, Geneva. 2014.

Sousa L. Building on personal networks when intervening with multi‐problem poor families. J Social Work Practice. 2005;19(2):163-79.

Giskes K, Avendaňo M, Brug J, Kunst A. A systematic review of studies on socioeconomic inequalities in dietary intakes associated with weight gain and overweight/obesity conducted among European adults. Obesity Reviews. 2010;11(6):413-29.

McNeill LH, Kreuter MW, Subramanian S. Social environment and physical activity: a review of concepts and evidence. Social Sci Med. 2006;63(4):1011-22.

Sweet E, Nandi A, Adam EK, McDade TW. The high price of debt: Household financial debt and its impact on mental and physical health. Social Sci Med. 2013;91:94-100.

Matos AR, Sousa LM. How multiproblem families try to find support in social services. Journal of Social Work Practice. 2004;18(1):65-80.

Nagelhout GE, Hogeling L, Spruijt R, Postma N, de Vries H. Barriers and facilitators for health behavior change among adults from multi-problem households: a qualitative study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017;14(10):1229.

Santiago CD, Wadsworth ME, Stump J. Socioeconomic status, neighborhood disadvantage, and poverty-related stress: Prospective effects on psychological syndromes among diverse low-income families. J Economic Psychol. 2011;32(2):218-30.

Meyer IH, Schwartz S, Frost DM. Social patterning of stress and coping: Does disadvantaged social statuses confer more stress and fewer coping resources? Social Sci Med. 2008;67(3):368-79.

Stringhini S, Berkman L, Dugravot A, Ferrie JE, Marmot M, Kivimaki M, et al. Socioeconomic status, structural and functional measures of social support, and mortality: The British Whitehall II Cohort Study, 1985–2009. American J Epidemiol. 2012;175(12):1275-83.

Phongsavan P, Chey T, Bauman A, Brooks R, Silove D. Social capital, socio-economic status and psychological distress among Australian adults. Social Sci Med. 2006;63(10):2546-61.

Cleland V, Granados A, Crawford D, Winzenberg T, Ball K. Effectiveness of interventions to promote physical activity among socioeconomically disadvantaged women: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Obesity Rev. 2013;14(3):197-212.

Reicks M, Trofholz AC, Stang JS, Laska MN. Impact of cooking and home food preparation interventions among adults: outcomes and implications for future programs. J Nutrition Education Behavior. 2014;46(4):259-76.

DeSalvo KB, Bloser N, Reynolds K, He J, Muntner P. Mortality prediction with a single general self‐rated health question. J General Internal Med. 2006;21(3):267-75.

Balkrishnan R, Anderson RT, Bowton D. Self-reported health status predictors of healthcare services utilization and charges in elderly asthmatic patients. J Asthma. 2000;37(5):415-23.

Lebanon N. How well does a single question about health predict the financial health of Medicare managed care plans? Effective Clin Pract. 1999;2(2):56-62.

Nagelhout GE, Verhagen D, Loos V, de Vries H. Belangrijke randvoorwaarden bij de ontwikkeling van leefstijlinterventies voor mensen met een lage sociaaleconomische status. [Important preconditions for development of lifestyle interventions for people with a low socioeconomic status]. Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen. 2018;96(1):37-45.

Nagelhout, GE. What to consider when developing lifestyle interventions for people with a low socioeconomic status. Available at: https://geranagelhout.wordpress.com/2018/01/31/what-to-consider-when-developing-lifestyle-interventions-for-people-with-a-low-socioeconomic-status/. Accessed 6 February 2018.

Michie S, Johnston M, Francis J, Hardeman W, Eccles M. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Applied Psychol. 2008;57(4):660-80.

Hanson S, Jones A. Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med. 2015;49(11):710-5.

Moene C. Hulp die helpt. Multiprobleemhulpverlening via de Sociaal wijkteams. Apeldoorn: Gemeente Apeldoorn. 2014.

Centraal Bureau voor de Satistiek. StatLine: Bevolking; kerncijfers; [StatLine: Population; key figures]. Den Haag, Heerlen: CBS. Available at: https://opendata.cbs.nl/statline/#/CBS/nl/. Accessed on 9 January 2018.

Reason P, Bradbury H. Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. London: Sage Publications; 2001.

MacLeod J, Nelson G. Programs for the promotion of family wellness and the prevention of child maltreatment: A meta-analytic review. Child Abuse Neglect. 2000;24(9):1127-49.

Al CM, Stams GJJ, Bek MS, Damen EM, Asscher JJ, van der Laan PH. A meta-analysis of intensive family preservation programs: Placement prevention and improvement of family functioning. Children Youth Services Rev. 2012;34(8):1472-9.

RIVM. Ervaren gezondheid. Available at: http://www.toolkitvtv.nl/inhoud/indicatoren-en-bronnen/gezondheidstoestand/ervaren-gezondheid/ Accessed on 18 May 2017.

Idler EL, Benyamini Y. Self-rated health and mortality: a review of twenty-seven community studies. Journal Health Social Behavior. 1997:21-37.

Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjorstrom M, Bauman AE, Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exercise. 2003;35(8):1381-95.

RIVM. Indicatoren voor de Monitor Volksgezondheid. Available at: https://www.monitor gezondheid.nl/volksindicatoren.aspx. Accessed on 18 May 2017.

Thorn JC, Coast J, Cohen D, Hollingworth W, Knapp M, Noble SM, et al. Resource-use measurement based on patient recall: issues and challenges for economic evaluation. Applied Health Economics Health Policy. 2013;11(3):155-61.

Dirum. Database of instruments for resource use measurement. Available at: www.dirum.org. Accessed on 18 May 2017.

EuroQol G. EuroQol--a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands). 1990;16(3):199.

De Jong Gierveld J, Van Tilburg T. A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness: Confirmatory tests on survey data. Res Aging. 2006;28(5):582-98.

Cuijpers P, Smits N, Donker T, Ten Have M, de Graaf R. Screening for mood and anxiety disorders with the five-item, the three-item, and the two-item Mental Health Inventory. Psychiatry Res. 2009;168(3):250-5.

Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Family Med. 2004;11:12.

Fransen M, Van Schaik T, Twickler T, Essink-Bot M. Applicability of internationally available health literacy measures in the Netherlands. J Health Communication. 2011;16(3):134-49.

Little RJ, Rubin DB. Statistical analysis with missing data. 2nd edition. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

Beenackers MA, Nusselder WJ, Oude Groeniger J, Van Lenthe FJ. Het terugdringen van gezondheidsachterstanden: een systematisch overzicht van kansrijke en effectieve interventies. Erasmus MC Universitair Medisch Centrum Rotterdam: Rotterdam, The Netherlands. 2015.

Rose S, Spinks N, Canhoto AI. Management research: Applying the principles. Routledge; 2014.

Karim K. Assessing the strengths and weaknesses of action research. Nursing Standard. 2001;15(26):33.

Norman DA. The research-Practice Gap: The need for translational developers. Interactions. 2010;17(4):9-12.


Data citation

x