Comparative study of electrolytes and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: spinal vs. general anaesthesia

Akash Gupta, Ravi Prakash, Vinita Singh, Jaishree Bogra, Dinesh Kaushal, Mohd. Parvez Khan, Vishwajeet Singh

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is a common surgery for renal stones and it can be performed under spinal and general anaesthesia. There is always a debate upon the superiority of one of the above technique over other. This study was undertaken to study the metabolic changes associated with the use of above techniques. We also studied the blood loss associated with them.

Methods: 60 patients of either sex, aged between 25 to 60 years belonging to ASA physical status I or II undergoing PCNL were divided randomly into two groups and they received spinal (SA) and general anaesthesia (GA) as per standard protocol and study parameters were evaluated.

Results: Blood pressure was lower and heart rate was higher in SA group compared to GA group. Changes in pH, bicarbonate, serum sodium, serum potassium and serum lactate were insignificant. Blood loss was report to be lower in SA group.

Conclusions: In both the groups, patients were haemodynamically stable throughout the surgery and both the techniques were safe regarding hemodynamic changes and no significant advantage or disadvantage exists between the two.  In both the groups there was a trend towards metabolic acidosis with increased lactate levels but it was not clinically significant with any of the anaesthetic technique. No changes were seen in electrolytes levels (Na and K) in any of the groups. Spinal anaesthesia was associated with lesser amount of blood loss and need for post-operative blood transfusion as compared to general anaesthesia.

Keywords

PCNL, Blood loss, Spinal, General anaesthesia

Full Text:

PDF

References

Mehrabi S, Karimzadeh Shirazi K. Results and complications of spinal anesthesia in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urology. 2010;7(1):22-5.

Atici S, Zeren S, Arıboğan A. Hormonal and hemodynamic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2001;32(3):311-4.

Vicentini FC, Gomes CM, Danilovic A. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: current concepts. Indian J Urol. 2009;25(1):4-10.

Singh V, Sinha RJ, Sankhwar SN, Malik A. A prospective randomized study comparing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia with percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general anaesthesia. Urol Int. 2011;87(3):293-8.

Dalela D, Goel A, Singh P, Shankhwar SN. Renal capsular block: a novel method for performing percutaneous nephrolithotomy under local anaesthesia. J Endourol. 2004;18(6):544-6.

Trivedi NS, Robalino J, Shevde K. Interpleural block: a new technique for regional anaesthesia during percutaneous nephrostomy and nephrolithotomy. Can J Anaesth. 1990;37(4 Pt 1):479-81.

Ferreyra G, Long Y, Ranieri VM. Respiratory complications after major surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009;15(4):342-8.

Malbouisson LM, Humberto F, Rodrigues Rdos R, Carmona MJ, Auler JO. Atelectasis during anaesthesia: pathophysiology and treatment. Rev Bras Anaestesiol. 2008;58(1):73-83.

Mohta M, Bhagchandani T, Tyagi A, Pendse M, Sethi AK. Haemodynamic, electrolyte and metabolic changes during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2008;40(2):477-82.

Köroğlu A, Toğal T, Ciçek M, Kiliç S, Ayas A, Ersoy MO. The effects of irrigation fluid volume and irrigation time on fluid electrolyte balance and haemodynamics in percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Int Urol Nephrol. 2003;35(1):1-6.

Khoshrang H, Falahatkar S, Ilat S, Akbar MH, Shakiba M, Farzan A, et al. Comparative study of hemodynamics electrolyte and metabolic changes during prone and complete supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Nephrourol Mon. 2012;4(4):622-8.

Feizzadeh B, Doosti H, Movarrekh M. Distilled water as an irrigation fluid in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Urol J. 2006;3(4):208-11.

Gehring H, Nahm W, Zimmermann K, Fornara P, Ocklitz E, Schmucker P. Irrigating fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 1999;43(3):316-21.

Fellahi JL, Richard JP, Bellezza M, Antonini A, Thouvenot JP, Cathala B. The intravascular transfer of glycine during percutaneous kidney surgery. Cah Anaesthesiol. 1992;40(5):343-7.

Kiliç S, Oğuz F, Kahraman B, Altunoluk B, Ergin H. Prospective evaluation of the alterations in the morphology and vascular resistance of the renal parenchyma with color Doppler ultrasonography after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Endourol. 2008;22(4):615-21.

Kuzgunbay B, Turunc T, Akin S, Ergenoglu P, Aribogan A, Ozkardes H. Percutaneous nephrolithotomy under general versus combined spinal-epidural anaesthesia. J Endourol. 2009;23(11):1835-8.

Morley-Forster PK. Unintentional hypothermia in the operating room. Can Anaesth Soc J. 1986;33(4):515-28.

Rozentsveig V, Neulander EZ, Roussabrov E, Schwartz A, Lismer L, Gurevich B, et al. Anaesthetic considerations during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Clin Anaesth. 2007;19(5):351-5.

Malhotra SK, Khaitan A, Goswami AK, Gill KD, Dutta A. Monitoring of irrigation fluid absorption during percutaneous nephrolithotripsy: the use of 1% ethanol as a marker. Anaesthesia. 2001;56(11):1103-6.

Netto NR Jr, Ikonomidis J, Ikari O, Claro JA. Comparative study of percutaneous access for staghorn calculi. Urology. 2005;65(4):659-62.

Liatsikos EN, Kapoor R, Lee B, Jabbour M, Barbalias G, Smith AD. Angular percutaneous renal access. Multiple tracts through a single incision for staghorn calculous treatment in a single session. Eur Urol. 2005;48(5):832-7.

Lee WJ, Smith AD, Cubelli V, Badlani GH, Lewin B, Vernace F, et al. Complications of percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Am J Roentgenol. 1987;148(1):177-80.

Srivastava A, Singh KJ, Suri A, Dubey D, Kumar A, Kapoor R, et al. Vascular complications after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: are there any predictive factors? Urology. 2005;66(1):38-40.

Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, St Lezin MA. Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol. 1994;152(6 Pt 1):1977-81.