A pilot study to assess the efficacy of VCare predict in early detection of pressure ulcer

Authors

  • Edison Bellarmin Beta MedTech Pte Ltd, Singapore
  • M. S. Ramasamy Sanjeev Biomedical Research Centre, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-3259.ijct20221023

Keywords:

VCare predict, Pressure ulcer, Early detection of pressure ulcer

Abstract

Background: The aim of the study to evaluate the efficiency of ‘VCare’ predict for early diagnosis of pressure ulcers/bedsores/pressure injury are a type of injury that breaks down the skin and underlying tissue leading to reddening of the skin to severe, deep craters with exposed muscle or bone necrosis. A pilot study was carried out to assess and compare efficacy of VCare predict and standard of care (SOC) in prediction of pressure ulcer among the high-risk patients being hospitalized.

Methods: The 30 female or male subjects aged ˃60 years were selected with inform consent and enrolled in the study. The efficiency of VCare predict was evaluated by comparison of arm A (VCare predict) and arm B SOC. The sensor patch is placed under sacrum for 30 seconds. It captures key parameters and transfer to the mobile app thru blue-tooth. Mobile app receives measured data, and it shows the risk level of the patient (Red, Yellow and Green) to recommend the frequency of flip to predict the early diagnosis of severity of pressure ulcer.

Results: The study results exemplified that efficiency of VCare predict which is more efficiently (with 31.4% lesser flips in Arm A) predict pressure injury leading to further complications.

 Conclusions: This study was concluded that VCare predict can be a highly effective risk assessment and mitigation tool in pressure ulcer management. With VCare predict, there was no adverse event found or experienced, hence it is a safer   tool to use.

Author Biography

Edison Bellarmin, Beta MedTech Pte Ltd, Singapore

Chief Scientific Officer

References

Coleman EA, Martau JM, Lin MK, Kramer AM. Pressure ulcer prevalence in long-term nursing home residents since the implementation of OBRA '87. Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2002;50(4):728-32.

Gallagher P, Barry P, Hartigan I, McCluskey P, O'Connor K, O'Connor M. Prevalence of pressure ulcers in three university teaching hospitals in Ireland. J Tissue Viability. 2008;17(4):103-9.

Schoonhoven L, Grobbee DE, Donders AR, Algra A, Grypdonck MH, Bousema MT et al. Prediction of pressure ulcer development in hospitalized patients: a tool for risk assessment. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006;15(1):65-70.

Kottner J, Wilborn D, Dassen T. Frequency of pressure ulcers in the paediatric population: a literature review and new empirical data. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(10):1330-40.

Langemo DK, Melland H, Hanson D, Olson B, Hunter S. The lived experience of having a pressure ulcer: a qualitative analysis. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2000;13(5):225-35.

Fox C. Living with a pressure ulcer: a descriptive study of patients' experiences. Br J Community Nurs. 2002;7(6):10-22.

McEvoy N, Avsar P, Patton D, Curley G, Kearney CJ, Moore Z. The economic impact of pressure ulcers among patients in intensive care units. A systematic review. J Tissue Viability. 2021;30(2):168-77.

Demarré L, Van Lancker A, Van Hecke A, Verhaeghe S, Grypdonck M, Lemey J et al. The cost of prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers: A systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015;52(11):1754-74.

Foglia E, Restelli U, Napoletano A, Coclite D, Porazzi E, Bonfanti M et al. Pressure ulcers management: an economic evaluation. J Preventive Med Hygiene. 2021;53(1):30-6.

Severens JL, Habraken JM, Duivenvoorden S, Frederiks CM. The cost of illness of pressure ulcers in The Netherlands. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2002;15(2):72-7.

Bhattacharya S, Mishra RK. Pressure ulcers: Current understanding and newer modalities of treatment. Indian J Plast Surg. 2015;48(1):4-16.

Kottner J, Dassen T. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units. Int J Nurs Stud. 2010;47(6):671-7.

Díaz-Caro I, García Gómez-Heras S. Incidence of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in patients with "minimal risk" according to the "Norton-MI" scale. PLoS One. 2020;15(1):e0227052.

Padula WV, Pronovost PJ. Addressing the multisectoral impact of pressure injuries in the USA, UK and abroad. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(3):171-3.

Padula WV, Delarmente BA. The national cost of hospital-acquired pressure injuries in the United States. Int Wound J. 2019;16(3):634-40.

Bauer K, Rock K, Nazzal M, Jones O, Qu W. Pressure Ulcers in the United States' Inpatient Population From 2008 to 2012: Results of a Retrospective Nationwide Study. Ostomy Wound Manage. 2016;62(11):30-8.

Aloweni F, Ang SY, Fook-Chong S, Agus N, Yong P, Goh MM, Tucker-Kellogg L, Soh RC. A prediction tool for hospital-acquired pressure ulcers among surgical patients: Surgical pressure ulcer risk score. Int Wound J. 2019;16(1):164-75.

Delmore B, Ayello EA, Smith D, Rolnitzky L, Chu AS. Refining heel pressure injury risk factors in the hospitalized patient. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2019;32(11):512-9.

Downloads

Published

2022-04-25

Issue

Section

Original Research Articles